Newsletter


Email:

Name:

10:03 | 17th December 2017

News: UK

Wed 24 Feb, 2010
By Sam Bristowe


It is essential that the BBC does give more publicity to new parties in order to help to break the stultifying stranglehold of the current political system.

Latest Headlines

Exclusive – Angela Eagle MP praises first ever LGBT History Month Magazine

Exclusive – Angela Eagle MP praises first ever LGBT History Month Magazine

The UKs first ever LGBT History Month magazine is being launched with the support of Angela Eagle


EasyJet offers free flight to Pope (Plus Speedy Boarding)

Budget airline EasyJet yesterday offered to fly Pope Benedict XVI to the UK following the recent controversy surrounding his viewpoints on British Equality laws and estimated cost of his visit.


Anger of The Sun gay minister survey

The Sun has caused havoc after publishing a poll yesterday asking whether gay people should be allowed to be cabinet ministers.


Harman confirms discrimination law bid dropped

The Government will not push through proposals that churches argue would restrict their ability to deny jobs to gay people and transsexuals, Equality Minister Harriet Harman has confirmed.


BBC Flouted Its Own Guidelines in the 2009 EU Elections

  • Send aticle to a friend
  • Send your Comments


An analysis being published today by the Jury Team, one of the political
parties in the newly formed Alliance for Democracy, shows that in last
summer’s European elections the BBC flouted its own guidelines for
impartiality.

The political parties UKIP and the BNP had much more coverage than the BBC
Trust had decided they should have as individual producers sought extra
ratings by featuring those parties. As a result of the extra BBC coverage,
UKIP won an additional MEP seat and the BNP won two MEP seats for the first
time.

The BBC Trust decided at its 15th April 2009 meeting to give the same
coverage to UKIP as it would to the three main traditional parties
(Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrats).

However an analysis for the
Jury Team by Taylor Nelson Sofres (TNS), the major market research agency,
shows that this is not what happened. TNS analysed the total number of
items broadcast on Radio 4, BBC1 and BBC2 over the election period 28th
April to 6th June 2009. This shows that UKIP was featured 58 times whereas
the Conservatives and Labour only had 50 and 45 mentions respectively and
the Liberal Democrats less than half as much as UKIP with 28 mentions, a
complete distortion of the BBC policy of equal treatment for these four
parties.

At the same meeting the BBC Trust agreed to give some national coverage to
the Green Party but none to the BNP. However subsequently Helen Boaden,
Head of BBC News, told her staff to give as much coverage to the BNP as to
the Green Party. In fact the BNP got 38 mentions, more than the 33 of the
Green Party and the 28 of the Liberal Democrats.

The Jury Team is committed to changing the way that the BBC decides on
election coverage which is mainly on the basis of the results in the
previous equivalent election. Sir Paul Judge, Founder of the Jury Team,
said:

“By using mainly the results of the last election to decide on coverage the
BBC stultifies our political system and entrenches the status quo, not
living up to the BBC’s Charter requirement of innovation. People are fed up
with the existing political parties. People want to vote for ‘none of the
above’. In the 2009 EU elections, two thirds of the electorate did not
vote. In the last general election in 2005, 40% of the electorate did not
vote but the BBC ignored those licence payers in its election coverage. The
BBC should be giving much more coverage to new political parties and ideas.”

By mainly basing election coverage decisions on what happened at the
previous election the BBC is failing to take into account:

- the increasing volatility of the electorate

- the fact that the largest party at a general election is the Abstainers
and the BBC must strive to find candidates and parties who can represent
that two-fifths of the electorate

- the latest polling evidence

- the formation of new political parties and movements

The Jury Team policy is that it is for Parliament to decide how parties may
be formed and people may validly be nominated as candidates for elections.
Sir Paul added:

“The BBC’s impartiality requires that it treats all candidates the same and
should give coverage to all parties predominantly on the basis of the number
of candidates they are putting forward rather than on the basis of previous
elections. It is essential that the BBC does give more publicity to new
parties in order to help to break the stultifying stranglehold of the
current political system.

The BBC must consult widely about their election guidelines as it is quite
clear that the decisions made about coverage can affect the result of the
election. These decisions must no longer be made in private by the BBC
Trust or, even worse, by an individual executive. The BBC also needs better
to monitor its election coverage to ascertain what actually happens. It is
quite clear from the analysis above by TNS that the coverage policies were
not translated into actual coverage. The BBC needs to take its
responsibilities for democracy more seriously.”

This need to publicise all strands of opinion on an equal basis was set out
in a letter to The Times from David Jordan, BBC Director of Editorial Policy
and Standards, who wrote in August 2009:

“Our job is to find the facts, test a wide range of opinion fairly and
rigorously and let the audience, armed with the best assessment of the
evidence we can provide, make up its own mind.”

The Jury Team is working to persuade the BBC to implement this clear policy
in its political coverage.

For further information see www.juryteam.org.

Press Release: The Jury Team

 

Back to previous page